Moral Dilemma
Picture a situation where you're responsible for recruiting for a position for one of your clients. As the CVs start streaming in you become hopeful at the quality of some of the applicants and breathe a sigh of relief that maybe this won't be as laborious a task as you had initially envisaged.
You email the CVs of the most suitable applicants to your client, pat yourself on the back for a job well done, and move on to more interesting demands on your time.
The next day the client phones you to speak to you about something 'unofficially and off the record'. He explains, rather awkwardly, that the fact that most of the candidates sent were muslim may be a problem. He stresses that it's not his prejudice, but that the MD is a Gujarati hindu and there are a number of fairly orthodox hindus working within the office. He confides in you that he's a bit reluctant to bring a muslim person into that environment as he wouldn't want them to be subjected to any inadvertant tension.
What would you do?
It's a fairly simple matter to find a non-muslim that could fill the same role, but would you feel yourself morally compromised? Would you feel compromised enough to turn down a few thousand pounds worth of business for the sake of your morals?
8 Comments:
hmmm. if i was the recruiter, i'd put forward the muslim candidates if i was still able to(even if you're certain the muslim candidates will be pre judged and marked against) - might seem like a timewaster but on the whole, it is more about the principle and the blatant unfairness. and should be addressed.
putting the candidate forward doesnt guarantee they'll secure the job so the thought of tension arising from working with the orthodox hindus remains a question at this point and i also believe the candidates should be given the opportunity at the very least.
if however the client is adamant on seeing only non muslim candidates then ultimately i dont think i could recruit for a company who so blatantly discriminates.
is this blog a hypothetical situation? out of interest, in your experience/opinion, how many hijabi candidates are successful in their job applications, within fairly corporate companies, in a short space of time?
that sounds like a pretty balanced approach sofia.
as to whether the situation is hypothetical i think is irrelevant.
>>out of interest, in your experience/opinion, how many hijabi candidates are successful in their job applications, within fairly corporate companies, in a short space of time?
i don't know i'm afraid but i have no doubt that just as being non-white impacts a person's chances when going for a job so would a hijab
Hi JJ. er..well...hmm...obviously i'd like to think i would support the same view irrespective of religion.
>>If the recruiter has any dignity, then they would refuse their blatantly prejudice demands
if the client is not himself prejudice but his concerns stem from issues of 'team fit' and tension in the working environment, then i don't think those demands are 'blatantly prejudice' but more complex than that.
i can imagine that i myself would be embarassed to bring a muslim friend into contact with a friend that i know is openly prejudiced against muslims
>>Trips, what the person is asking you to do off the record
steady on there harinder, don't jump to conclusions dear boy
>Sincerest apologies
some people..chi..so presumptious....
right about what jj? i'm posing a hypothetical scenario and you guys are getting all legal on my arse. why are you jumping to conclusions that (a) i'm talking about me and (b)that i'm talking about a real situation?
hmm in a "hypothetical" world- i'd say f**k it- just give them the cv they want. every company has specific cultural requirements and if this is theirs, prejudiced as it might be, then just give them what they want instead of wasting their time. advanced capitalistism? maybe. but hell, the way i see it, this is not about a person's (the recruiter's) integrity, it's about what's going to work best for the recruiter's client. the client will not have to wade wastefully through cvs they will not even consider for a job. expensive loss of their time and money. if they have 30 suitable cvs and know that they'll only look at 3 becase of their bias, why bother sending the others? that'll only lead to them getting pissed off with the recruiter.
Post a Comment
<< Home